TinySaint
About this Entry
Posted by: TinySaint

Visit TinySaint's Xanga Site

Original: 2/8/2007 8:31 PM
Views: 30
Comments: 11
eProps: 4

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site


Who gave the eProps?
2 eProps!2 eProps! 2 eProps from:
AP_Complicate
Ephraem_Syrus


Thursday, February 08, 2007

Theory of Gravity Wrong!

 

Finally, Christian Science has arrived!

 

Eat it Einstein!

 

The following is from this article:

 

Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory

KANSAS CITY, KS—As the debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools continues, a new controversy over the science curriculum arose Monday in this embattled Midwestern state. Scientists from the Evangelical Center For Faith-Based Reasoning are now asserting that the long-held "theory of gravity" is flawed, and they have responded to it with a new theory of Intelligent Falling.

"Things fall not because they are acted upon by some gravitational force, but because a higher intelligence, 'God' if you will, is pushing them down," said Gabriel Burdett, who holds degrees in education, applied Scripture, and physics from Oral Roberts University.

Burdett added: "Gravity—which is taught to our children as a law—is founded on great gaps in understanding. The laws predict the mutual force between all bodies of mass, but they cannot explain that force. Isaac Newton himself said, 'I suspect that my theories may all depend upon a force for which philosophers have searched all of nature in vain.' Of course, he is alluding to a higher power."

Founded in 1987, the ECFR is the world's leading institution of evangelical physics, a branch of physics based on literal interpretation of the Bible.

According to the ECFR paper published simultaneously this week in the International Journal Of Science and the adolescent magazine God's Word For Teens!, there are many phenomena that cannot be explained by secular gravity alone, including such mysteries as how angels fly, how Jesus ascended into Heaven, and how Satan fell when cast out of Paradise.

The ECFR, in conjunction with the Christian Coalition and other Christian conservative action groups, is calling for public-school curriculums to give equal time to the Intelligent Falling theory. They insist they are not asking that the theory of gravity be banned from schools, but only that students be offered both sides of the issue "so they can make an informed decision."

"We just want the best possible education for Kansas' kids," Burdett said.

Proponents of Intelligent Falling assert that the different theories used by secular physicists to explain gravity are not internally consistent. Even critics of Intelligent Falling admit that Einstein's ideas about gravity are mathematically irreconcilable with quantum mechanics. This fact, Intelligent Falling proponents say, proves that gravity is a theory in crisis.

"Let's take a look at the evidence," said ECFR senior fellow Gregory Lunsden."In Matthew 15:14, Jesus says, 'And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.' He says nothing about some gravity making them fall—just that they will fall. Then, in Job 5:7, we read, 'But mankind is born to trouble, as surely as sparks fly upwards.' If gravity is pulling everything down, why do the sparks fly upwards with great surety? This clearly indicates that a conscious intelligence governs all falling."

Critics of Intelligent Falling point out that gravity is a provable law based on empirical observations of natural phenomena. Evangelical physicists, however, insist that there is no conflict between Newton's mathematics and Holy Scripture.

"Closed-minded gravitists cannot find a way to make Einstein's general relativity match up with the subatomic quantum world," said Dr. Ellen Carson, a leading Intelligent Falling expert known for her work with the Kansan Youth Ministry. "They've been trying to do it for the better part of a century now, and despite all their empirical observation and carefully compiled data, they still don't know how."

"Traditional scientists admit that they cannot explain how gravitation is supposed to work," Carson said. "What the gravity-agenda scientists need to realize is that 'gravity waves' and 'gravitons' are just secular words for 'God can do whatever He wants.'"

Some evangelical physicists propose that Intelligent Falling provides an elegant solution to the central problem of modern physics.

"Anti-falling physicists have been theorizing for decades about the 'electromagnetic force,' the 'weak nuclear force,' the 'strong nuclear force,' and so-called 'force of gravity,'" Burdett said. "And they tilt their findings toward trying to unite them into one force. But readers of the Bible have already known for millennia what this one, unified force is: His name is Jesus."

 

 

 Posted 2/8/2007 8:31 PM - 30 Views - 4 eProps - 11 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

11 Comments

Visit AP_Complicate's Xanga Site!
Sounds like you've been reading Dawkins or Bertrand Russell. Unfortunately, I cannot respond to your questions adequately for I am not well-versed in Atheism. Please talk to Ephraem about it, as he was a nihilist for most of his cognizant years. To give any response to you would not only be foolish but slightly deceptive; I must humbly accept the cloud of unknowing on this one.

As for you, how is your Fundamentalist wife taking this?
Posted 2/8/2007 9:34 PM by AP_Complicate - reply

Visit Ephraem_Syrus's Xanga Site!

Haha!

David Hume's case for Christ!!!

Posted 2/8/2007 10:24 PM by Ephraem_Syrus - reply

Visit TinySaint's Xanga Site!

"Sounds like you've been reading Dawkins or Bertrand Russell."

And soil myself with having to think?  Never.

"Unfortunately, I cannot respond to your questions adequately for I am not well-versed in Atheism."

Well, I just assumed that since you called them fools and liars in your blog, you must have a good reason for doing so.  I hadn't imagined you to be the type of person to form such opinions and have no idea why.  If I am wrong, please elaborate about atheists so I can pass your wisdom on the topic to other Christians. 

Posted 2/9/2007 1:43 AM by TinySaint - reply

Visit AP_Complicate's Xanga Site!
You seem not to know what pethi and nabal are. Anyways, what I was saying was that Atheism is proving to be a far better argument than Islam at this current stage, which is why it's a bigger beast.
Posted 2/9/2007 3:11 AM by AP_Complicate - reply

Visit TinySaint's Xanga Site!

I have always understood Nabal to be a fool:

 1Sa 25:25 Let not my lord, I pray thee, regard this man of Belial, even Nabal: for as his name is, so is he; Nabal is his name, and folly is with him: but I thine handmaid saw not the young men of my lord, whom thou didst send.

Some also say it refers to a person who is closed off to God.  The Dali Lama would be a good example.

Pethi: Simple, naive, irresponsible….

It appeared you were applying these terms to atheism, along with the terms fool and liar.  If you did not mean that toward atheists than I was wrong.  Anyway, do not worry about the atheists, we can beat them in our sleep.  It is the sincere Pastafanarians we have to be concerned about.

 

Posted 2/9/2007 10:01 AM by TinySaint - reply

Visit AP_Complicate's Xanga Site!
Pethi was not directed towards Atheists, I am sorry if the sentence structure made it seem so. My bad.

Nabal is Hebrew for God-denier.

And you spelled Pastafarian incorrectly. Next time use Russell's Teapot, it's easier to spell.
Posted 2/9/2007 11:46 AM by AP_Complicate - reply

Visit TinySaint's Xanga Site!

Thanks for the spelling correction! 

"Next time use Russell's Teapot, it's easier to spell."

I prefer calling it the Celestial Teapot.  If we use Russell’s name, we may inadvertently direct some unsuspecting Christians to his materials.  We cannot afford to lose any more good souls to the dark side.

Posted 2/9/2007 12:42 PM by TinySaint - reply

Visit AP_Complicate's Xanga Site!
You're a funny man, and I fear we're making ourselves look like asses through this dialogue.

On a serious note, are you really an Atheist? It's becoming rather difficult to discern where your flag waves.
Posted 2/9/2007 3:13 PM by AP_Complicate - reply

Visit TinySaint's Xanga Site!
"You're a funny man, and I fear we're making ourselves look like asses through this dialogue."

I see a deeper point than that, and I thank you for helping me illustrate it.

"On a serious note, are you really an Atheist? It's becoming rather difficult to discern where your flag waves."

Where on earth would you get that idea?  Also, be careful in subscribing to the notion that people can be boxed so neatly:

Don't ask what kind of music I'm gonna play tonight
Just stay awhile, hear for yourself awhile
And if you must put me in a box, make sure it's a big box
With lots of windows
And a door to walk through
And a nice high chimney
So we can burn burn burn everything that we don't like
And watch the ashes fly up to Heaven
Maybe all the way to India
I'd like that

-Dan Bern  http://danbern.redacorn.net/lyrics/jerusalem.html

Posted 2/9/2007 4:18 PM by TinySaint - reply

Visit AP_Complicate's Xanga Site!
Alright, well, I'm tired of these games.
Posted 2/9/2007 5:54 PM by AP_Complicate - reply

Visit Ephraem_Syrus's Xanga Site!
I'm far too neurotic to be an Atheist. I think folks like Richard Dawkins are too laid back for their own good. I feel that I resemble George Berkeley or Meister Eckhart, as unfortunate as that may sound.
Posted 2/9/2007 6:13 PM by Ephraem_Syrus - reply


Choose Identity
(?)
 
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 
Profile Pic:
Default  |  Choose »  (?)



Back to TinySaint's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in TinySaint's local time zone:
GMT -06:00 (Central Standard - US, Canada)

Click on a Christian Web Ring button
(This site in the Web Ring is owned by TinySaint)

Click here to visit our online Church Previous Site Next Site Random Site List Sites Join the Web Ring Visit the Prayer Room Visit ChristRing Ministries Evil Atheist Conspiracy WebRingPreviousRandomWebRing HomeNext